<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Search for Silky Sorbet Doesn&#8217;t Go Smoothly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leitesculinaria.com/10572/writings-food-science-grainy-sorbet.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leitesculinaria.com/10572/writings-food-science-grainy-sorbet.html#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Recipes, Food, and Cooking Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 06:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary, LC Food History Editor</title>
		<link>http://leitesculinaria.com/10572/writings-food-science-grainy-sorbet.html#comment-6059</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary, LC Food History Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leitesculinaria.com/wordpress/?p=10572#comment-6059</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Cindi. All of this makes perfect sense. (And yes, I have encountered those dreaded specks of seized chocolate from time to time—and found them virtually impossible to eliminate.) I&#039;ve just chalked it as &quot;seized chocolate is seized chocolate, and that&#039;s all there is to it&quot; (just as once sugar goes past the caramel stage there&#039;s no going back—all one can do is start soaking the blackened remains out of the pan and start over again.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Cindi. All of this makes perfect sense. (And yes, I have encountered those dreaded specks of seized chocolate from time to time—and found them virtually impossible to eliminate.) I&#8217;ve just chalked it as &#8220;seized chocolate is seized chocolate, and that&#8217;s all there is to it&#8221; (just as once sugar goes past the caramel stage there&#8217;s no going back—all one can do is start soaking the blackened remains out of the pan and start over again.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindi Kruth, LC Recipe Tester</title>
		<link>http://leitesculinaria.com/10572/writings-food-science-grainy-sorbet.html#comment-5987</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindi Kruth, LC Recipe Tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leitesculinaria.com/wordpress/?p=10572#comment-5987</guid>
		<description>Hi Wilson, Jen, and Gary. Perfectly smooth chocolate ice cream or sorbet is surprisingly difficult to obtain.  Freezing  exaggerates the tiniest bits of undissolved chocolate solids.

Adding water or a similar liquid (cream, even butter) when melting chocolate will indeed prevent seizing.  Twenty percent may work, but if you are melting fine quality dark chocolate which contains a higher amount of cocoa solids (usually 55-65%) you will need a little more liquid.  I&#039;d suggest starting with 25%, by weight or roughly 1 tablespoon of liquid for 2 ounces of chocolate.  Cocoa powder, being all cocoa solids, would require even more liquid.

Gary is right in his assumption that temperature matters.  Whenever possible I dissolve cocoa powder in boiling water.  To bring out the deepest chocolate flavor, try  cooking the cocoa in the water, at just the lowest simmer,  for a minute or so before adding any other ingredients. 

It may sound odd, but it does seem to matter whether you add chocolate to the hot liquid or hot liquid to the chocolate.  Most ganache recipes, for example, instruct you to boil the cream and pour it over chopped chocolate.  I sometimes find, depending on the chocolate and how finely it has been chopped, that this leaves little specks of unmelted (seized) chocolate.  Stirring the chocolate into the hot cream, however, is less likely to create specks.  I&#039;m not sure why this should matter, but I suspect it has to do with how rapidly the cream cools off which would obviously affect its ability to melt the chocolate. Once the specks form they are not easily dissolved, even if you reboil the mixture.   And, as you have discovered, straining them out reduces the chocolate flavor.

Hope this helps. Cindi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Wilson, Jen, and Gary. Perfectly smooth chocolate ice cream or sorbet is surprisingly difficult to obtain.  Freezing  exaggerates the tiniest bits of undissolved chocolate solids.</p>
<p>Adding water or a similar liquid (cream, even butter) when melting chocolate will indeed prevent seizing.  Twenty percent may work, but if you are melting fine quality dark chocolate which contains a higher amount of cocoa solids (usually 55-65%) you will need a little more liquid.  I&#8217;d suggest starting with 25%, by weight or roughly 1 tablespoon of liquid for 2 ounces of chocolate.  Cocoa powder, being all cocoa solids, would require even more liquid.</p>
<p>Gary is right in his assumption that temperature matters.  Whenever possible I dissolve cocoa powder in boiling water.  To bring out the deepest chocolate flavor, try  cooking the cocoa in the water, at just the lowest simmer,  for a minute or so before adding any other ingredients. </p>
<p>It may sound odd, but it does seem to matter whether you add chocolate to the hot liquid or hot liquid to the chocolate.  Most ganache recipes, for example, instruct you to boil the cream and pour it over chopped chocolate.  I sometimes find, depending on the chocolate and how finely it has been chopped, that this leaves little specks of unmelted (seized) chocolate.  Stirring the chocolate into the hot cream, however, is less likely to create specks.  I&#8217;m not sure why this should matter, but I suspect it has to do with how rapidly the cream cools off which would obviously affect its ability to melt the chocolate. Once the specks form they are not easily dissolved, even if you reboil the mixture.   And, as you have discovered, straining them out reduces the chocolate flavor.</p>
<p>Hope this helps. Cindi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary, LC Food History Editor</title>
		<link>http://leitesculinaria.com/10572/writings-food-science-grainy-sorbet.html#comment-5926</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary, LC Food History Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leitesculinaria.com/wordpress/?p=10572#comment-5926</guid>
		<description>Interesting... does it make a difference whether you add chocolate to water or the other way &#039;round? Also, I assume the temperature of the water is an issue, yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; does it make a difference whether you add chocolate to water or the other way &#8217;round? Also, I assume the temperature of the water is an issue, yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://leitesculinaria.com/10572/writings-food-science-grainy-sorbet.html#comment-5877</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leitesculinaria.com/wordpress/?p=10572#comment-5877</guid>
		<description>If you incorporate 20% or more water into melted chocolate it will not seize, in fact it is rather smooth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you incorporate 20% or more water into melted chocolate it will not seize, in fact it is rather smooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

