“Watch out for my uncle, he's a cannibal!”
That’s the way my nieces and nephews introduce me to their friends--oh wait, so does Ken Albala. I should probably point out that the ages of the children (not including my co-editor, who is a child only in the best metaphorical sense) range from eight to sixteen--those magical years when the ability to gross out one’s friends is an important tool in achieving social status. It pleases me to be able to furnish a small frisson of disgust in order to aid in their quest for popularity.I hasten to add that I am not, in fact, an anthropophagist. I have read and written a lot about cannibals , though--enough, to be sure, to know that my interest in the consumption of human flesh is purely academic.
Mostly academic.
Well, somewhat academic.
There is a small, deeply buried part of me that is still (some people might argue that it’s neither as small nor as deeply buried as I believe) adolescent. Let’s just say I’m adolescent enough to enjoy watching the moment of transient fear and confusion that flickers across people’s faces when they discover my obsession with cannibals. Most of them know of my interest in food and cooking--indeed, many of them have eaten meals I’ve prepared. In that brief darkening expression, one can almost see them counting off past dinners at my house, and wondering if they should have been more concerned about the identity of the main ingredients.
What I find curious, however, is that once their momentary social awkwardness passes, people who believed they knew nothing about such a disreputable subject start spouting little facts--and alleged facts--they’ve accumulated in normal life (perhaps when they, themselves, were adolescents). Sometimes they mention famous criminal cases, sometimes they repeat old clichés about encounters of explorers and missionaries with savage eaters of men, but most often they tell cannibal jokes.
There’s something about the idea of munching on a nice leg o’ man that makes everyone want to be a comedian.
Jokes are, in part, a way of hiding real anxiety about touchy subjects, but this is more than just nervous laughter; it’s clear that these people like to discuss eating people--supposedly, the ultimate taboo--once someone else is kind enough to bring up the subject. William Bueller Seabrook, a man who acquired more first-hand knowledge about the fundamental facts of cannibalism than most of the civilized people who talk about it--including myself--wrote about cannibals in 1931: “Even aside from their delightful humorous aspect they are a highly interesting and wholly legitimate subject, whether for the adventurer or the learned anthropologist.”
Cannibals are fascinating, and our fascination with them is, in itself...ummm...ahhhh...fascinating.
Of course, nothing interests us more than ourselves, and Ambrose Bierce (in an 1868 essay, "Did We Eat One Another?") carried that rather obvious observation to its logical conclusion: “Our uniform vanity has given us the human mind as the acme of intelligence, the human face and figure as the standard of beauty. Of course we cannot deny to human fat and lean an equal superiority over beef, mutton and pork.”
This little collection does not aim to resolve the question of the superiority of human fat and lean over beef, mutton and pork, or whether humans should, or should not, be on the menu -- but I like to think that some of the tales here will add appreciably to the range of topics available for discussion over dinner.
If such talk puts others off their feed, so be it--it just means that there will all the more leftovers for us.
besides being our food history editor, Gary Allen is the co-editor, along with Ken Albala of Human Cuisine. (You just can't make this stuff up.)
Labels: cannibalism, Gary Allen, Human Cuisine


















0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home